<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 883 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781415</link>
    <description>SC held the HC erred in relegating the appellant to an alternative remedy and should have considered the writ in light of SC precedent on delay and laches. The SC found the show-cause cum demand notice issued nearly seven years after the assessment year was barred by delay and laches, set aside the impugned HC order, quashed the show-cause cum demand notice and the original order, allowed the appeal and disposed of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 883 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781415</link>
      <description>SC held the HC erred in relegating the appellant to an alternative remedy and should have considered the writ in light of SC precedent on delay and laches. The SC found the show-cause cum demand notice issued nearly seven years after the assessment year was barred by delay and laches, set aside the impugned HC order, quashed the show-cause cum demand notice and the original order, allowed the appeal and disposed of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>