<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 897 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781429</link>
    <description>ITAT held that issuance of notice u/s 143(2) and assessment framed by the ITO was valid despite return below Rs.20 lakh, noting CBDT instruction permitting adjustment of pecuniary limits; additional ground dismissed. Concerning order u/s 144 passed ex parte, ITAT found lack of participation by the assessee required the CIT(A) to afford an opportunity of hearing; the tribunal set aside the ex parte disposal and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 897 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781429</link>
      <description>ITAT held that issuance of notice u/s 143(2) and assessment framed by the ITO was valid despite return below Rs.20 lakh, noting CBDT instruction permitting adjustment of pecuniary limits; additional ground dismissed. Concerning order u/s 144 passed ex parte, ITAT found lack of participation by the assessee required the CIT(A) to afford an opportunity of hearing; the tribunal set aside the ex parte disposal and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>