<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 912 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781444</link>
    <description>ITAT RAJKOT held the penalty under s.271(1)(b) invalid where notices were served on a deceased assessee without issuing or intimating penalty proceedings to legal heirs. The AO failed to bring the legal representative on record despite being informed of the death. Noting that penalties cannot be imposed on a dead person, the Tribunal deleted the penalty and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 912 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781444</link>
      <description>ITAT RAJKOT held the penalty under s.271(1)(b) invalid where notices were served on a deceased assessee without issuing or intimating penalty proceedings to legal heirs. The AO failed to bring the legal representative on record despite being informed of the death. Noting that penalties cannot be imposed on a dead person, the Tribunal deleted the penalty and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>