<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 920 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781452</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that TDS deducted on part consideration received in a later year must be credited because the full sale consideration was declared and taxed in the earlier year. On verifying Form 26AS for both years, the tribunal found the sale consideration matched the earlier return, so income could not be taxed twice. The CIT(A)&#039;s rejection for lack of verifiable returns was set aside, and the restricted TDS credit by CPC was overturned, directing allowance of the claimed TDS credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 920 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781452</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that TDS deducted on part consideration received in a later year must be credited because the full sale consideration was declared and taxed in the earlier year. On verifying Form 26AS for both years, the tribunal found the sale consideration matched the earlier return, so income could not be taxed twice. The CIT(A)&#039;s rejection for lack of verifiable returns was set aside, and the restricted TDS credit by CPC was overturned, directing allowance of the claimed TDS credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>