<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 926 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781458</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in three bank accounts were held to be satisfactorily explained where they matched earlier withdrawals from the same accounts. The withdrawals were claimed to have been made for proposed house construction, and when the project did not proceed, the amounts were redeposited. On verification, the explanation was accepted as supported by the account trail, so the addition for unexplained cash deposits was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 926 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781458</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in three bank accounts were held to be satisfactorily explained where they matched earlier withdrawals from the same accounts. The withdrawals were claimed to have been made for proposed house construction, and when the project did not proceed, the amounts were redeposited. On verification, the explanation was accepted as supported by the account trail, so the addition for unexplained cash deposits was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>