<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 927 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781459</link>
    <description>The HC found a gross violation of natural justice in the impugned assessment proceedings, noting the taxpayer&#039;s cooperation from issuance of notices and that an objection under s.144C(2) was filed with the DRP while a copy was emailed to the AO. The assessment order under s.147 read with s.144C(3) and the DRP order were quashed. The matters are remitted to the respondents for fresh consideration and issuance of orders consistent with law and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 927 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781459</link>
      <description>The HC found a gross violation of natural justice in the impugned assessment proceedings, noting the taxpayer&#039;s cooperation from issuance of notices and that an objection under s.144C(2) was filed with the DRP while a copy was emailed to the AO. The assessment order under s.147 read with s.144C(3) and the DRP order were quashed. The matters are remitted to the respondents for fresh consideration and issuance of orders consistent with law and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>