<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 215 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47954</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to participate in an enquiry regarding a demand notice for an erroneous payment, allowing them to raise the limitation issue. The respondents were instructed to consider all objections, with emphasis on addressing the limitation point first if valid. No costs were awarded, and a related application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 215 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47954</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to participate in an enquiry regarding a demand notice for an erroneous payment, allowing them to raise the limitation issue. The respondents were instructed to consider all objections, with emphasis on addressing the limitation point first if valid. No costs were awarded, and a related application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>