https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781466 HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure and penalty orders under s.129(3) of the GST Act. The court held the e-way bill was generated well before detention and was produced with the reply, negating any inference of intent to evade tax. In view of the timely production of the required document, the impugned orders were unsustainable in law and set aside. en-us Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781466 HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure and penalty orders under s.129(3) of the GST Act. The court held the e-way bill was generated well before detention and was produced with the reply, negating any inference of intent to evade tax. In view of the timely production of the required document, the impugned orders were unsustainable in law and set aside. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781466