<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1726 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464785</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a customs order was held not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found no violation of natural justice in the impugned order and treated the appellate mechanism as the proper remedy. As a result, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1726 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464785</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a customs order was held not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found no violation of natural justice in the impugned order and treated the appellate mechanism as the proper remedy. As a result, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>