<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1562 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464787</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 and the consequent notices and attachment under s.24(3), holding the issues are governed by existing precedent. Although there was a 272-day delay in filing, the Court allowed condonation of delay. The petition seeking prospective application of the Act and quashing of the attachment was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1562 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464787</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 and the consequent notices and attachment under s.24(3), holding the issues are governed by existing precedent. Although there was a 272-day delay in filing, the Court allowed condonation of delay. The petition seeking prospective application of the Act and quashing of the attachment was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>