https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464794 ITAT held the trust to be primarily charitable-engaged in education and healthcare-with incidental temple activities not converting it into a religious trust. The tribunal found mere mention of temples in some objects did not make the trust wholly or substantially religious and that denial of section 80G(5) benefits was incorrect. The matter was remitted to the file of the CIT(E) to determine whether expenditure on religious activities exceeded the permissible 5% under section 80G(5B). Appeal allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:20:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464794 ITAT held the trust to be primarily charitable-engaged in education and healthcare-with incidental temple activities not converting it into a religious trust. The tribunal found mere mention of temples in some objects did not make the trust wholly or substantially religious and that denial of section 80G(5) benefits was incorrect. The matter was remitted to the file of the CIT(E) to determine whether expenditure on religious activities exceeded the permissible 5% under section 80G(5B). Appeal allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464794