<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 162 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47949</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved illegal importation of Tin, Nickel, and Zinc concealed as Aluminum scrap, with the appellant misdeclaring goods and admitting to wrongdoings. The Tribunal justified confiscation and penalties based on evidence of smuggling, leading to dismissal of appeals. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the deliberate nature of the offense and upheld the confiscation and penalties imposed, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 162 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47949</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved illegal importation of Tin, Nickel, and Zinc concealed as Aluminum scrap, with the appellant misdeclaring goods and admitting to wrongdoings. The Tribunal justified confiscation and penalties based on evidence of smuggling, leading to dismissal of appeals. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the deliberate nature of the offense and upheld the confiscation and penalties imposed, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>