<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 141 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47946</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellant to pay 50% of the disputed amount, totaling Rs. 1,73,656/-, and remitted the matter back to the Commissioner for further adjudication. The appellant was instructed to pay the balance amount within a specified timeframe for the appeal to be considered on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 141 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47946</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellant to pay 50% of the disputed amount, totaling Rs. 1,73,656/-, and remitted the matter back to the Commissioner for further adjudication. The appellant was instructed to pay the balance amount within a specified timeframe for the appeal to be considered on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>