<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 1006 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464774</link>
    <description>Section 92 CPC applies only to a subsisting public charitable or religious trust, with reliefs falling within the section and plaintiffs having a genuine interest in that trust. The document notes that the first defendant was a registered society, the limited construction trust had already been dissolved, and the plaintiffs&#039; claims were intertwined with personal employment grievances rather than trust administration. It also states that Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 does not convert a society&#039;s governing body into trustees for Section 92 purposes. Leave to sue was therefore rightly refused, and the suit was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 1006 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464774</link>
      <description>Section 92 CPC applies only to a subsisting public charitable or religious trust, with reliefs falling within the section and plaintiffs having a genuine interest in that trust. The document notes that the first defendant was a registered society, the limited construction trust had already been dissolved, and the plaintiffs&#039; claims were intertwined with personal employment grievances rather than trust administration. It also states that Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 does not convert a society&#039;s governing body into trustees for Section 92 purposes. Leave to sue was therefore rightly refused, and the suit was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>