<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty imposition but reduced the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for an assessee consuming fuel without paying duty for electricity generation. Despite arguments for a mandatory penalty equal to duty amount, the Tribunal reduced the penalty due to lack of evidence of intentional evasion. The Court referenced previous judgments on public sector undertakings but dismissed the appeal, noting the absence of findings on intent to evade duty by the Tribunal. This case clarifies penalty interpretation, duty exemptions, intent consideration in penalties, and treatment of public sector entities in duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty imposition but reduced the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for an assessee consuming fuel without paying duty for electricity generation. Despite arguments for a mandatory penalty equal to duty amount, the Tribunal reduced the penalty due to lack of evidence of intentional evasion. The Court referenced previous judgments on public sector undertakings but dismissed the appeal, noting the absence of findings on intent to evade duty by the Tribunal. This case clarifies penalty interpretation, duty exemptions, intent consideration in penalties, and treatment of public sector entities in duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>