<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 140 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47939</link>
    <description>The confiscation order on import classification was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The Supreme Court left undisturbed the confiscation of excess goods not covered by the import licence, indicating that only the disputed classification and related findings required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 140 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47939</link>
      <description>The confiscation order on import classification was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The Supreme Court left undisturbed the confiscation of excess goods not covered by the import licence, indicating that only the disputed classification and related findings required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>