<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 231 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47938</link>
    <description>The court examined whether confiscation and fines could be decided independently of duty liability, contested the Tribunal&#039;s disregard of facts on record, evaluated the validity of advance licenses, and considered the relevance of Supreme Court precedent. The court addressed objections regarding delay condonation and maintainability, ultimately allowing the application and directing the Tribunal to prepare a statement for referral to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 231 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47938</link>
      <description>The court examined whether confiscation and fines could be decided independently of duty liability, contested the Tribunal&#039;s disregard of facts on record, evaluated the validity of advance licenses, and considered the relevance of Supreme Court precedent. The court addressed objections regarding delay condonation and maintainability, ultimately allowing the application and directing the Tribunal to prepare a statement for referral to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>