<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 839 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781371</link>
    <description>Refund claims for accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 are subject to the limitation prescribed in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 unless a different statutory provision excludes its application. The Tribunal held that this limitation also applies to service tax matters through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, the claim was treated as time-barred and the rejection of refund was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 839 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781371</link>
      <description>Refund claims for accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 are subject to the limitation prescribed in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 unless a different statutory provision excludes its application. The Tribunal held that this limitation also applies to service tax matters through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, the claim was treated as time-barred and the rejection of refund was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>