https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364 HC held that entitlement to an award under the 31 July 2015 Notification is discretionary and not a vested right; an informer cannot enforce grant of a reward or challenge the impugned order on that ground. Court questioned maintainability of the petition and observed the petitioner, being an informer, lacks standing to contest merits solely to claim an award. The petitioner (informer) was directed to remain present and parties were ordered to be ready to address maintainability. Matter listed for further hearing on 18 December 2025. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:44:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364 HC held that entitlement to an award under the 31 July 2015 Notification is discretionary and not a vested right; an informer cannot enforce grant of a reward or challenge the impugned order on that ground. Court questioned maintainability of the petition and observed the petitioner, being an informer, lacks standing to contest merits solely to claim an award. The petitioner (informer) was directed to remain present and parties were ordered to be ready to address maintainability. Matter listed for further hearing on 18 December 2025. Case-Laws GST Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364