<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 832 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364</link>
    <description>An informer claiming reward under a departmental notification was held, on a prima facie view, to have no enforceable right to challenge the merits of the adjudication merely because reward is discretionary. The Delhi HC kept open the objection on locus standi and maintainability, and directed the parties to address that issue on the next date. No final adjudication was made on the petition, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 832 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364</link>
      <description>An informer claiming reward under a departmental notification was held, on a prima facie view, to have no enforceable right to challenge the merits of the adjudication merely because reward is discretionary. The Delhi HC kept open the objection on locus standi and maintainability, and directed the parties to address that issue on the next date. No final adjudication was made on the petition, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>