<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 833 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781365</link>
    <description>The HC found the dismissal of the appeal for delay (&gt; four months) unsustainable because the Appellate Authority failed to consider a Division Bench judgment of this Court. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Appellate Authority to reconsider the delay and merits in light of that Division Bench decision. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 833 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781365</link>
      <description>The HC found the dismissal of the appeal for delay (&gt; four months) unsustainable because the Appellate Authority failed to consider a Division Bench judgment of this Court. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Appellate Authority to reconsider the delay and merits in light of that Division Bench decision. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>