<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 834 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781366</link>
    <description>HC held that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was impermissible where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect. Petitioner having been found untraceable at the principal place of business and not afforded adequate opportunity to participate in SCN proceedings, with its reply not considered, amounted to violation of natural justice. The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the GST registration and disposed of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 834 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781366</link>
      <description>HC held that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was impermissible where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect. Petitioner having been found untraceable at the principal place of business and not afforded adequate opportunity to participate in SCN proceedings, with its reply not considered, amounted to violation of natural justice. The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the GST registration and disposed of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>