https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464773 In an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its own view for a possible and reasonable conclusion reached by the arbitrator. Section 34 permits only limited interference with an arbitral award on recognised grounds, and Section 37 does not enlarge that scope or allow the appellate court to sit in appeal over the arbitral reasoning. Where the award is supported by the record and falls within a permissible view, it must be left undisturbed. The arbitral award and the Section 34 order were restored. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:43:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464773 In an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its own view for a possible and reasonable conclusion reached by the arbitrator. Section 34 permits only limited interference with an arbitral award on recognised grounds, and Section 37 does not enlarge that scope or allow the appellate court to sit in appeal over the arbitral reasoning. Where the award is supported by the record and falls within a permissible view, it must be left undisturbed. The arbitral award and the Section 34 order were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464773