https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781299 A plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC finally determines the lis and is therefore a decree within Section 2(2) CPC. An appeal against such rejection lies under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 because the proviso limits only appeals from specified interlocutory orders under Order XLIII CPC and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Rejection of a plaint is not an interlocutory order, so it falls outside that restriction. The earlier relied-on authority was distinguished as it concerned rejection of applications under Order VII Rule 10 and Order VII Rule 11(d), which were treated differently. en-us Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781299 A plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC finally determines the lis and is therefore a decree within Section 2(2) CPC. An appeal against such rejection lies under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 because the proviso limits only appeals from specified interlocutory orders under Order XLIII CPC and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Rejection of a plaint is not an interlocutory order, so it falls outside that restriction. The earlier relied-on authority was distinguished as it concerned rejection of applications under Order VII Rule 10 and Order VII Rule 11(d), which were treated differently. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781299