<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 776 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781308</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA may be sustained even where the property holder is not named as an accused, if the material shows that the attached property or its equivalent value represents proceeds of crime received, parked or layered through that person. The Tribunal examined advances from the main accused company, the absence of actual mineral supply, statements recorded under Section 50(2) of the PMLA, and bank records and related documents. On that basis, it found that the funds were transferred as part of a scheme to park and layer proceeds of crime, and that the appellants failed to show a bona fide business transaction or return of the money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 776 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781308</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA may be sustained even where the property holder is not named as an accused, if the material shows that the attached property or its equivalent value represents proceeds of crime received, parked or layered through that person. The Tribunal examined advances from the main accused company, the absence of actual mineral supply, statements recorded under Section 50(2) of the PMLA, and bank records and related documents. On that basis, it found that the funds were transferred as part of a scheme to park and layer proceeds of crime, and that the appellants failed to show a bona fide business transaction or return of the money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>