<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 780 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781312</link>
    <description>Leasehold rights under a lease deed can form part of a corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency estate where they are transferable property interests and have been brought within the debtor&#039;s asset schedule through a valid amalgamation scheme. The Tribunal held that deciding whether an asserted asset belongs to the corporate debtor is an insolvency question within the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority and appellate tribunal. It further held that only the leasehold interest, not the underlying land owned by the lessor, was included in the liquidation estate, and that the liquidator could take custody and advertise the leasehold asset for sale. The appeal therefore failed and the rejection of the appellant&#039;s application was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 780 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781312</link>
      <description>Leasehold rights under a lease deed can form part of a corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency estate where they are transferable property interests and have been brought within the debtor&#039;s asset schedule through a valid amalgamation scheme. The Tribunal held that deciding whether an asserted asset belongs to the corporate debtor is an insolvency question within the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority and appellate tribunal. It further held that only the leasehold interest, not the underlying land owned by the lessor, was included in the liquidation estate, and that the liquidator could take custody and advertise the leasehold asset for sale. The appeal therefore failed and the rejection of the appellant&#039;s application was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>