https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781316 A 751-day delay in filing an appeal was found unexplained and the request for condonation was rejected. The explanation that the alleged unauthorised trading was unknown was not accepted because the record showed that the appellant and his family were aware of the disputed trades in 2017. The absence of contemporaneous steps such as a legal notice or police complaint further undermined the explanation. As a result, the delay was not condoned and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:26:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781316 A 751-day delay in filing an appeal was found unexplained and the request for condonation was rejected. The explanation that the alleged unauthorised trading was unknown was not accepted because the record showed that the appellant and his family were aware of the disputed trades in 2017. The absence of contemporaneous steps such as a legal notice or police complaint further undermined the explanation. As a result, the delay was not condoned and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781316