<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 785 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781317</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found no sufficient ground to interfere with the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s impugned order on merits and declined the request for broader relief. It nevertheless granted limited relief by setting aside the direction imposing costs, leaving the merits determination undisturbed while removing the costs component in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 785 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781317</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found no sufficient ground to interfere with the Securities Appellate Tribunal&#039;s impugned order on merits and declined the request for broader relief. It nevertheless granted limited relief by setting aside the direction imposing costs, leaving the merits determination undisturbed while removing the costs component in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>