https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47931 The High Court of Delhi addressed the impugned order by CEGAT regarding the pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounts, emphasizing compliance with s. 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court faulted CEGAT for remanding the matter instead of directly deciding on the pre-deposit issue. The Court restored the Writ Petition, granting a seven-day extension for compliance and restraining the Respondents from taking any actions during this period. If the deposit was not made within seven days, the Respondents could proceed with necessary actions. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition and all pending applications, providing a comprehensive resolution to the legal dispute. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:46:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47931 The High Court of Delhi addressed the impugned order by CEGAT regarding the pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounts, emphasizing compliance with s. 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court faulted CEGAT for remanding the matter instead of directly deciding on the pre-deposit issue. The Court restored the Writ Petition, granting a seven-day extension for compliance and restraining the Respondents from taking any actions during this period. If the deposit was not made within seven days, the Respondents could proceed with necessary actions. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition and all pending applications, providing a comprehensive resolution to the legal dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47931