<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 792 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781324</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal, holding the custodian entitled to waiver of cost recovery charges retrospectively from the date of application (April 2009 to 3 Nov 2015) and to refund of amounts paid. The tribunal relied on Gujarat HC authority and on a Telangana HC decision declaring the Regulations imposing CRC ultra vires the Customs Act, concluding the department lacked authority to levy CRC; the impugned commissioner&#039;s order was set aside and the refund granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 792 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781324</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal, holding the custodian entitled to waiver of cost recovery charges retrospectively from the date of application (April 2009 to 3 Nov 2015) and to refund of amounts paid. The tribunal relied on Gujarat HC authority and on a Telangana HC decision declaring the Regulations imposing CRC ultra vires the Customs Act, concluding the department lacked authority to levy CRC; the impugned commissioner&#039;s order was set aside and the refund granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>