<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 800 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781332</link>
    <description>Receipts from software, support services, training, and allied oilfield activities were treated as falling within the special presumptive regime for oilfield services because their pith and substance showed a direct, inextricable connection with prospecting for, extraction of, or production of mineral oil; they were therefore taxable under section 44BB and not as fees for technical services or royalty under the general charging provisions. Interest on income-tax refund was separately governed by the India-USA DTAA and was taxable at the treaty rate applied under Article 11. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the assessee&#039;s treatment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 13:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 800 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781332</link>
      <description>Receipts from software, support services, training, and allied oilfield activities were treated as falling within the special presumptive regime for oilfield services because their pith and substance showed a direct, inextricable connection with prospecting for, extraction of, or production of mineral oil; they were therefore taxable under section 44BB and not as fees for technical services or royalty under the general charging provisions. Interest on income-tax refund was separately governed by the India-USA DTAA and was taxable at the treaty rate applied under Article 11. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the assessee&#039;s treatment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>