<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 191 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47929</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order regarding the seized goods within two weeks, emphasizing that the decision did not express any opinion on the merits of detention justification. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, leaving the final decision on the goods to be determined by the authorities within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 191 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47929</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order regarding the seized goods within two weeks, emphasizing that the decision did not express any opinion on the merits of detention justification. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, leaving the final decision on the goods to be determined by the authorities within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>