<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781345</link>
    <description>ITAT (Del.) upheld the co-ordinate bench&#039;s view, directing deletion of the addition treating an administration fee as royalty and holding there was no reason to depart from earlier findings. The Tribunal further found that the subscription fee for access to copyrighted articles does not constitute royalty under the Act or the India-US DTAA, relying on subsequent higher court precedent; accordingly the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed and the additions disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781345</link>
      <description>ITAT (Del.) upheld the co-ordinate bench&#039;s view, directing deletion of the addition treating an administration fee as royalty and holding there was no reason to depart from earlier findings. The Tribunal further found that the subscription fee for access to copyrighted articles does not constitute royalty under the Act or the India-US DTAA, relying on subsequent higher court precedent; accordingly the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed and the additions disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>