https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781356 The HC allowed the petition, quashing two adjudication orders and the impugned show-cause notice issued in November 2023, and issued consequential directions. The court considered contention about issuance of a single SCN for multiple assessment years and that one officer issued the SCN while separate officers passed the orders, along with the retrospective/prospective effect of amendments to Rules 42(1)(f) and 42(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and found relief warranted. en-us Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781356 The HC allowed the petition, quashing two adjudication orders and the impugned show-cause notice issued in November 2023, and issued consequential directions. The court considered contention about issuance of a single SCN for multiple assessment years and that one officer issued the SCN while separate officers passed the orders, along with the retrospective/prospective effect of amendments to Rules 42(1)(f) and 42(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and found relief warranted. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781356