<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 828 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781360</link>
    <description>SC granted notice in a challenge to a HC order that refused relief because an alternative remedy lay before the Commissioner, GST. Petitioners argued that input tax credit (ITC) cannot be denied merely because the supplier&#039;s GST registration was cancelled and that their independent entitlement to ITC should be upheld. The SC listed the matter for hearing on 8.12.2025 and directed service of paper books on counsel for the State of West Bengal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 828 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781360</link>
      <description>SC granted notice in a challenge to a HC order that refused relief because an alternative remedy lay before the Commissioner, GST. Petitioners argued that input tax credit (ITC) cannot be denied merely because the supplier&#039;s GST registration was cancelled and that their independent entitlement to ITC should be upheld. The SC listed the matter for hearing on 8.12.2025 and directed service of paper books on counsel for the State of West Bengal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>