<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47927</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) to promptly decide on stay applications or main appeals regarding the provisional assessment of imported goods. Pending a decision, bank guarantees were not to be invoked, but the petitioners were instructed to maintain them. The court emphasized timely resolution and active bank guarantees until a final decision is reached, dismissing related miscellaneous petitions and not awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47927</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) to promptly decide on stay applications or main appeals regarding the provisional assessment of imported goods. Pending a decision, bank guarantees were not to be invoked, but the petitioners were instructed to maintain them. The court emphasized timely resolution and active bank guarantees until a final decision is reached, dismissing related miscellaneous petitions and not awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>