<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47921</link>
    <description>The petitioner was accused of customs duty evasion in the purchase of dry fruits. Despite conflicting statements, the Court granted bail, considering the petitioner&#039;s background, lack of necessity for custodial interrogation, and societal roots. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lac with one surety of the same amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47921</link>
      <description>The petitioner was accused of customs duty evasion in the purchase of dry fruits. Despite conflicting statements, the Court granted bail, considering the petitioner&#039;s background, lack of necessity for custodial interrogation, and societal roots. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lac with one surety of the same amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>