https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47920 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for interest on the market value of seized silver bars, emphasizing that the principles allowing interest on detained goods did not apply since the bars were returned intact. The Court noted the absence of evidence of loss or damages due to retention and highlighted the delayed demand for interest. It concluded that the claim for interest was a supplementary relief sought after the main petition was allowed, indicating it should have been raised separately. Therefore, the Court declined to grant the claim for interest on the silver bars' market value. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:04:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47920 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for interest on the market value of seized silver bars, emphasizing that the principles allowing interest on detained goods did not apply since the bars were returned intact. The Court noted the absence of evidence of loss or damages due to retention and highlighted the delayed demand for interest. It concluded that the claim for interest was a supplementary relief sought after the main petition was allowed, indicating it should have been raised separately. Therefore, the Court declined to grant the claim for interest on the silver bars' market value. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47920