<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47917</link>
    <description>An accused is entitled to discharge under Section 239 CrPC where the record does not disclose a prima facie case or even grave suspicion against him. The court found the prosecution materials insufficient to connect the accused with the alleged smuggling conspiracy, as the statements of others did not implicate him in stuffing or export of contraband, the alleged telephone call had no incriminating value, and a co-accused&#039;s confession could not be used without independent supporting material. On these facts, discharge was warranted and proceedings could not continue against him, though the case continued against the remaining accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 205 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47917</link>
      <description>An accused is entitled to discharge under Section 239 CrPC where the record does not disclose a prima facie case or even grave suspicion against him. The court found the prosecution materials insufficient to connect the accused with the alleged smuggling conspiracy, as the statements of others did not implicate him in stuffing or export of contraband, the alleged telephone call had no incriminating value, and a co-accused&#039;s confession could not be used without independent supporting material. On these facts, discharge was warranted and proceedings could not continue against him, though the case continued against the remaining accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>