<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Receipts from tenant admission to housing society deemed capital contributions, not transfer consideration under s.2(47); s.50C inapplicable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94134</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the impugned receipts, received by a housing society from occupying tenants on admission as members, constituted capital contributions/membership fees towards a building repair and development fund and not consideration for transfer within the meaning of s.2(47). The Tribunal found the receipts arose pursuant to membership admission terms and the conveyance/committee records, and that the allottees merely became class members while already in occupation. Consequently, s.50C valuation provisions were inapplicable and the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under s.50C was unsustainable; the addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Receipts from tenant admission to housing society deemed capital contributions, not transfer consideration under s.2(47); s.50C inapplicable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94134</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the impugned receipts, received by a housing society from occupying tenants on admission as members, constituted capital contributions/membership fees towards a building repair and development fund and not consideration for transfer within the meaning of s.2(47). The Tribunal found the receipts arose pursuant to membership admission terms and the conveyance/committee records, and that the allottees merely became class members while already in occupation. Consequently, s.50C valuation provisions were inapplicable and the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under s.50C was unsustainable; the addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>