https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781204 Proof of the loan transaction, cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and service of statutory notice attracted the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut those presumptions with reliable evidence, and the defence materials did not displace the complainant's version. As no perversity or illegality was shown in the concurrent findings, the Kerala High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 and declined to interfere with the sentence, which had already been reduced by the appellate court to the minimum possible term. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781204 Proof of the loan transaction, cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and service of statutory notice attracted the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the cheque holder. The accused failed to rebut those presumptions with reliable evidence, and the defence materials did not displace the complainant's version. As no perversity or illegality was shown in the concurrent findings, the Kerala High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 and declined to interfere with the sentence, which had already been reduced by the appellate court to the minimum possible term. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781204