<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 674 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781206</link>
    <description>SC affirmed HC&#039;s finding that petitioners failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act where cheques issued as advances were dishonoured and signatures admitted. The Court issued notice to explore compounding, returnable in six weeks, and directed that, subject to deposit, the effect and operation of the impugned judgment remain stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 674 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781206</link>
      <description>SC affirmed HC&#039;s finding that petitioners failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act where cheques issued as advances were dishonoured and signatures admitted. The Court issued notice to explore compounding, returnable in six weeks, and directed that, subject to deposit, the effect and operation of the impugned judgment remain stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>