<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 687 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781219</link>
    <description>AT upheld the impugned findings against the appellant but granted a limited carve-out: the appellant may access the securities market solely to issue fresh equity by preferential allotment to a specified prospective investor and group entities, and may accept a proposed Rs.50 crore loan prior to issuance subject to regulatory approvals and compliance with applicable law. SEBI&#039;s restraint preventing the restrained individuals from serving as KMP in other companies for one year remains effective, but continuation of one restrained individual as a director of the appellant was permitted. All other directions stand; penalty may be paid within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 687 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781219</link>
      <description>AT upheld the impugned findings against the appellant but granted a limited carve-out: the appellant may access the securities market solely to issue fresh equity by preferential allotment to a specified prospective investor and group entities, and may accept a proposed Rs.50 crore loan prior to issuance subject to regulatory approvals and compliance with applicable law. SEBI&#039;s restraint preventing the restrained individuals from serving as KMP in other companies for one year remains effective, but continuation of one restrained individual as a director of the appellant was permitted. All other directions stand; penalty may be paid within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>