<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 690 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781222</link>
    <description>AT dismissed the appeals and refused relief under Regulation 43B. The tribunal held appellants knowingly failed to comply with the August 2023 Circular, chose not to make granular disclosures or re-align portfolios, yet subscribed to convertible warrants after receiving notice of the Circular and subsequent warnings. Regulation 43B relief requires non-compliance to be beyond the entity&#039;s control; no such cause was shown. The tribunal found subscription a deliberate breach, noted lack of diligence despite communications, and concluded the 43B applications did not merit consideration, dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:02:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 690 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781222</link>
      <description>AT dismissed the appeals and refused relief under Regulation 43B. The tribunal held appellants knowingly failed to comply with the August 2023 Circular, chose not to make granular disclosures or re-align portfolios, yet subscribed to convertible warrants after receiving notice of the Circular and subsequent warnings. Regulation 43B relief requires non-compliance to be beyond the entity&#039;s control; no such cause was shown. The tribunal found subscription a deliberate breach, noted lack of diligence despite communications, and concluded the 43B applications did not merit consideration, dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>