https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781224 CESTAT CHENNAI - AT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 after service of notice and repeated non-appearance by the appellant on multiple hearing dates. The Tribunal held adjournments will not be granted routinely without cogent proof of cause, found no interest in pursuing the appeal, and disposed of the matter for default. The order preserves the applicant's statutory remedy to seek restoration on showing sufficient cause for absence. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781224 CESTAT CHENNAI - AT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 after service of notice and repeated non-appearance by the appellant on multiple hearing dates. The Tribunal held adjournments will not be granted routinely without cogent proof of cause, found no interest in pursuing the appeal, and disposed of the matter for default. The order preserves the applicant's statutory remedy to seek restoration on showing sufficient cause for absence. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781224