https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781227 CESTAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, finding no sufficient cause or supporting proof for the appellant's non-appearance on hearing dates. The Bench noted that while Rule 20 permits setting aside such dismissals if the appellant subsequently shows sufficient cause, no justification was established here and adjournments cannot be granted without serious reason. The appeal was rejected for default and disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781227 CESTAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, finding no sufficient cause or supporting proof for the appellant's non-appearance on hearing dates. The Bench noted that while Rule 20 permits setting aside such dismissals if the appellant subsequently shows sufficient cause, no justification was established here and adjournments cannot be granted without serious reason. The appeal was rejected for default and disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781227