https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781233 A prohibition order against a Customs Broker under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was treated as dependent on pending inquiry proceedings, even though the prohibition power could operate independently in principle. Because the related inquiry no longer survived and the broker had not sought continuation of Mumbai operations before expiry of the relevant registration, the order had become ineffective by lapse of time. No subsisting cause remained for appellate interference, and the challenge was held infructuous. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781233 A prohibition order against a Customs Broker under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was treated as dependent on pending inquiry proceedings, even though the prohibition power could operate independently in principle. Because the related inquiry no longer survived and the broker had not sought continuation of Mumbai operations before expiry of the relevant registration, the order had become ineffective by lapse of time. No subsisting cause remained for appellate interference, and the challenge was held infructuous. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781233