https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781235 CESTAT (New Delhi) held that seizure of imported fabrics could not be sustained where the Commissioner rejected Bills of Entry without examining declarants as witnesses and without admitting their statements into evidence. Minor discrepancies in marks and numbers or filing omissions did not justify rejecting the Bills of Entry. The Commissioner erred in treating those documents as invalid; therefore the order confiscating the goods and imposing penalties was set aside and the appeal allowed. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:23:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781235 CESTAT (New Delhi) held that seizure of imported fabrics could not be sustained where the Commissioner rejected Bills of Entry without examining declarants as witnesses and without admitting their statements into evidence. Minor discrepancies in marks and numbers or filing omissions did not justify rejecting the Bills of Entry. The Commissioner erred in treating those documents as invalid; therefore the order confiscating the goods and imposing penalties was set aside and the appeal allowed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781235