https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781244 HC dismissed the appeals as not maintainable, holding that the dispute-classification and duty rate on imported metallurgical coke breeze under tariff heading 2704 00 and entitlement to exemption-was essentially a matter already before the CESTAT and, under Section 130E(b) of the Act, the appropriate remedy lies by way of appeal to the SC. Consequently, the HC declined jurisdiction and dismissed the appeals. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781244 HC dismissed the appeals as not maintainable, holding that the dispute-classification and duty rate on imported metallurgical coke breeze under tariff heading 2704 00 and entitlement to exemption-was essentially a matter already before the CESTAT and, under Section 130E(b) of the Act, the appropriate remedy lies by way of appeal to the SC. Consequently, the HC declined jurisdiction and dismissed the appeals. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781244