<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781250</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi - AT upheld the CIT(A)/NFAC and quashed the assessment reopening under s.147/s.148, finding the AO&#039;s reasons deficient because the original s.143(3) assessment existed and the reasons did not allege non-disclosure of material particulars in that assessment. The Tribunal held recorded reasons cannot be amended later and the Revenue failed to rebut these facts, resulting in the reopening being set aside and the appeal decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781250</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi - AT upheld the CIT(A)/NFAC and quashed the assessment reopening under s.147/s.148, finding the AO&#039;s reasons deficient because the original s.143(3) assessment existed and the reasons did not allege non-disclosure of material particulars in that assessment. The Tribunal held recorded reasons cannot be amended later and the Revenue failed to rebut these facts, resulting in the reopening being set aside and the appeal decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>