<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 202 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47904</link>
    <description>Interest and consequential penalty under the Customs Act, 1962 were held unsustainable where the original assessment order, based on the bills of entry, had not been challenged. The Tribunal reasoned that a show cause notice invoking interest under Section 61(2) read with Section 28 could not stand unless the assessment itself was first disturbed. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 202 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47904</link>
      <description>Interest and consequential penalty under the Customs Act, 1962 were held unsustainable where the original assessment order, based on the bills of entry, had not been challenged. The Tribunal reasoned that a show cause notice invoking interest under Section 61(2) read with Section 28 could not stand unless the assessment itself was first disturbed. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>